On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Alan L Tyree wrote: > > > The development list wouldn't be very interesting without the intense > > interaction that it now has with users. The org list seems unique in > > this, at least for the lists that I have sometimes monitored. > > No, really, it's not that unique. And many project still works correctly > with several mailing list. > I know that most projects work this way, and I am sure that Org would survive and prosper no matter what the decision is here. I still say, of the lists that I have monitored (not many - I am a retired Law Professor with only a slight knowledge of software development) the Org list is the most interesting. It's just a personal preference - I don't see any decisive argument for any of the possible decisions on splitting the list. Whatever happens, many thanks to all the Org developers for some great software. Cheers, Alan > > -- > Julien Danjou > ❱ http://julien.danjou.info > -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
