Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom". Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree sometimes :). ,----[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#GFDL ] | Much documentation written by the GNU Project, the Linux Documentation | Project and others licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | contain invariant sections, which do not comply with the DFSG. This | assertion is the end result of a long discussion and the General | Resolution 2006-001.[11] | | Due to the GFDL invariant sections, content under this license must be | separately contained in an additional "non-free" repository which is not | officially considered part of Debian. `---- hth Memnon
