> > In my opinion we should very much make the gdb-ui code the default. > > As for keeping support for --fullname, I believe it's needed as long as the > > gdb-ui code isn't as robust as the --fullname one. I'm not sure what is the > > current state of affairs, but I've had to switch to --fullname because of > > minor problems at least once in the last year.
> I think another issue is multiple-debugging session support (though I > like the new gdb-ui too). Not critical for most people, but may be for > some. FWIW I never suggested removing --fullname now, just not allowing it's use with "M-x gdb" so that the Graphical Interface would work in those cases where currently only M-x gdba does. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
