Re: Redefining common tags? (partial solution)

[RobertCZ]

Gerald Richter wrote: Well, now I see it works when I write [$ syntax + ParkhotelPruhonice $] <h2>Parkhotel Průhonice</h2> in the file itself, but when I try [- Execute({inputfile => '*', syntax => 'Embperl ParkhotelPruhonice'}) -] in base file as recommended in the docs... I guess you mean that it does not work in the second case? Do you set the syntax elsewehre? For example in a get_recipe method? It's working now, I must have done something stupid... I'm sorry. - Robert PS1 Actually I tried [- Execute({inputfile => '*', syntax => 'Embperl ParkhotelPruhonice'}) -] but now I have the correct one [- Execute({inputfile => '*', syntax => 'EmbperlNoTR ParkhotelPruhonice'}) -] I don't put </tr> elements into HTML and Embperl used to complain so I have my own sytax without automatic table processing. I can guess Embperl didn't find </tr> in the source and instead of returning an error returned some wierd output - it behaves this way at times... PS2 When I'm at it: <td> doesn't have to be closed and Embperl respects it and according to the HTML specs TR doesn't have to be closed too - can default Embperl be made more forgiving and ignore unclosed TR's? My hack just remove <tr> processing completely, that is hardly optimal