Hi Michael, I like it.
I take issues, though, with the final line: "the implementation cost is low: two bit masks per block, one bit mask per parameter" I agree that the implementation cost (I assume you mean execution time) is low, but it is higher than what you say. You leave out the time for getters and setters. I would say the the execution time is low because any increases in total execution time are O(n) where n is the number of lines. Or said differently, any increase in execution time for a line is a constant. Thanks for your work on this. Regards, Ken On 5/1/2012 4:14 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: > on #linuxcnc-devel there's currently a discussion (mostly cradek and me in > the last few days) about a future linuxcnc design. In that context, > 'queuebusters' and the synchronization of interpreter state came up. > > I think I came up with a more elegant, flexible and language independent > solution to this issue than we currently have > > I've written up some thoughts here: > http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?QueuebustersRevisited > > I'd appreciate any comments > > - Michael > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers