That’s correct. We are using MachineKit-HAL for its instantiable components and better HAL Python bindings. Hopefully that functionality could make its way back into LinuxCNC at some point.
> On Oct 11, 2023, at 5:53 AM, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 12:08, John Allwine <j...@pentamachine.com> wrote: >> >> Seems like there could be a significant performance hit for 32 bit >> architectures. We don’t directly use LinuxCNC, but EMCApplication is a >> shallow fork of LinuxCNC that will occasionally pull from upstream. We use >> EMCApplication on the BeagleBone Black, which is a 32 bit architecture and >> is already a bit strained performance-wise. > > That's unfortunate. Debian is no longer shipping 32-bit installers and > LinuxCNC only supports Buster, Bullseye and Bookworm on x86 and arm64 > at the moment. > > I assume that this also means that you are not using the new 64-bit HAL pins? > > A compile-time switch to force everything (_including_ 64-bit HAL > pins?) to 32 bits should be possible. > > -- > atp > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is > designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and > lunatics." > — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
