Hi John,

I am not familiar with GOST and I don't doubt there are people on this forum
better informed to address your query. What I do know is that CE is not 
required outside the scope of the EU membership. At present, AFAIK, the 
EU member states are: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, 
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, 
Spain, Sweden and UK. My information may be a little outdated.

A country outside the scope of the EU may choose to take advantage of
the product quality inherent in the process that leads to the mark by 
insisting on CE-marked imports, but really, the mark only has legal 
implications within the EU. 

I am not sure about the Russian market, and perhaps some of our Russian based
compliance engineers may help here. Alternatively, the persons importing the 
product would be able to advise.

Regards

- Chris Chileshe

-----Original Message-----
From:   Bouse, John [SMTP:john.bo...@perkinelmer.com]
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:23 PM
To:     emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:        CE Mark and GOST


Hello Group,

Is the CE Mark sufficient to allow products (laboratory instruments, 
for example) to be sold/shipped into the Russian Federation, or is 
the GOST mark also required?

Regards,
John Bouse
PKI
Shelton, CT  USA
===================================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Chileshe [mailto:chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk]
Sent: September 13, 2001 12:38 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark



Hi Ralph,

The CE mark is not exclusive to EMC. Indeed, it refers to compliance with
all directives relevant to the product, so a teddy bear will be CE marked if
it meets the requirements of the toy directive and all relevant safety
directives.

Pressure vessels will have to meet the requirements of the pressure
directive
and so on, and if any product crosses boundaries, it has to meet all the
applicable
directives.

However, the CE mark is a declaration of conformity and you can self
certify. 
This means I can disappear into my garage for a few weeks and emerge with 
a CE marked product - and it would be perfectly legal - as long as the
declaration
is true i.e. I have done what needs to be done to prove compliance, and one
way
to do this would be to test to applicable harmonised standards. Validity of
self 
certification may change in due course but at the moment, that is how it is.

I like Chris Maxwell's spin on the meaning of CE, and it would be true if 
every firm made a distinction between the compliance engineer and the 
designer. In all the companies I have worked for - we do it all i.e. the
designer
designs to spec, takes the product through type approval tests, then through
precompliance and then through full compliance. So the electronics designers
are responsible for meeting all the applicable directives (EMC, electrical
safety)
and functional type approval and they do so by product proving and EMC
testing
the product themselves - to the applicable standard. They are also
responsible for 
the technical documentation for the electrical aspects of the product. The 
mechanical engineers and hydraulics engineers do likewise and when it's all
done,
the fall guy (engineering director) puts his signature on the declaration of
conformity.
What this means is that if the declaration should subsequently be proven
false, he 
is the one who goes to the gallows.

Wait a minute! I used to think everyone worked that way, but I get the
feeling 
I may be doing too much! That does it! I am off to see the payroll people
soon 
after sending this e-mail and hopefully will emerge with a CE marked cheque
- 
or CE marked letter of dismissal!! You can never be too sure with these
accounts people.

Regards y'all

- Chris Chileshe


-----Original Message-----
From:   Ralph Cameron [SMTP:ral...@igs.net]
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:57 PM
To:     Chris Chileshe; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:        Re: CE Mark

I think its fair to state that CE also equates to designed in level of
immunity to electromagnetic interference, i.e.  reduced sensitivity or
susceptibility.  In my view , a highly desireable because it prevents a lot
of what's out there from coming in and conversely a lot of what's inside
from coming out.

It's a compromise but better than nothing.

Ralph cameron
EMC Consulting and Suppression of Consumer Electronics
(after sale)

<< snip >>

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to