On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote >If you are so sure that your product complies with the protection >requirements of the EMC Directive even if it failed to pass the test, >you have chance to use TCF Route instead of the Standard Route.
>Regards, >Tom Tom, could you explain your thinking on this a little more? I feel that too often TCFs are written just to get around test failures or to bypass testing even when standards apply. Some test houses are even implying in their advertising that they can "get around the testing" by writing a TCF. Bob Heller 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: emc_p...@symbol.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
