In general, and for UL and CSA in particular, crimped terminals are evaluated 
for the number, size, stranding and types of wire under the crimp.

In most cases, only single wires are evaluated, unless the manufacturer 
specifies that they want additional testing.

Wire sizes are critical for any particular crimp design. Too large and all 
strands might not consolidate well under the crimp or might prevent adequate 
“squish” of the crimped joint and the crimp will fail. Too small and the crimp 
will never hold. Either case could serve sources of risk of fire and electric 
shock.

For UL standards, the default stranding is Class B. Other stranding counts 
require additional evaluation. I suspect, but have not confirmed, the same is 
true for CSA standards. It is not necessarily true that the more strands these 
better, since too many strands can form a poor crimp and the crimp tool or the 
crimp itself can cut or nick strands, which is not a good result. (I have asked 
both UL and CSA about decimating strands to get a wire size to fit into a 
connector crimp and was told this was unacceptable. An understandable response.)

Copper is the default wire type used for evaluation. Evaluations using aluminum 
conductors (or anything more exotic) must be done separately.

There is no magic method to find crimp terminals that are safety certified for 
multiple conductors under a crimp. They do exist, but it requires creative 
internet searches and contacting suppliers. Make certain you get copies of 
their certification test reports to verify any claims.


Regards,

Peter Tarver

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. 
It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in 
any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this 
message!

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to