That is a valuable remark.

Instead one should look-out for EN 55035 to be published; until then equipment legally need to comply with EN 55024  and both standards should be considered.

The publication date of that standard is currently unknown.

The scope of the affiliated standards EN 55022 and EN 55024 is ITE,

The scope of EN55032/EN55035 will be *multimedia equipment* and is larger than ITE.

Gert Gremmen

HAS Consultant RED and EMC at European Commission.

On 26-5-2018 10:47, John Woodgate wrote:

EN 55024 has only a very limited future life. I would not recommend applying it to a new product.

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-05-26 08:50, Gert Gremmen; ce-test wrote:

Hi David,


CISPR 32 is not relevant as this is not a Harmonised European standard.

While CISPR IEC and EN standards may have similar numberings, they are not the same in all aspects.

EN 55032 _is_ a Harmonised European Standard (based on CISPR32) and applies to both Industrial and Residential ITE products, and a printer is a typical ITE product. So at first view EN 55032 is the preferred standard.That said, i did not actually see your printers.

EN 55011 has a more extended emission frequency range, and is probably more expensive to test as EN 55032.

The generic standards  61000-6-1/2/3/4  are supposed to be used only in case of absence of suitable product group standards (such as EN 55011 and EN 55032 for emissions and EN 55024 for immunity). As that is the case, (as EN 55024 has no suitable test levels for (Class A) industrial operation), for reliable operation in an industrial environment the EN 61000-6-2 is the right alternative to EN 55024.

The best combination from both performance and legal view is probable EN 55032 Class A and EN 61000-6-2.

You might also apply just for EN 55032 and EN 55024 to obtain presumption of conformity and CE-mark and take a higher of field problems.



Gert Gremmen

HAS Consultant RED and EMC at European Commission.


On 24-5-2018 7:01, itl-emc user group wrote:

An industrial printer has been tested to EN 55011: 2009 + A1: 2010 and EN 61000-6-2: 2005 + AC: 2006 (latest EMCD OJ).

Another industrial printer has been tested to EN 61000-6-4: 2007 + A1: 2011 and EN 61000-6-2: 2005 + AC: 2006 (latest EMCD OJ).

The printers are used in an industrial environment only.

Any opinions as to whether or not CISPR 32 is relevant as well.

Thanks in advance to any responses.

*Regards,***

*David Shidlowsky***| Technical Reviewer

*Address*1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel

*Tel*972-8-9186113*Fax* 972-8-9153101

*Mail*: dav...@itlglobal.org <mailto:dav...@itlglobal.org>/dav...@itl.co.il <mailto:dav...@itl.co.il>/e...@itl.co.il *Web* www.itlglobal.org <http://www.itlglobal.org>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>




-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to