For the person in abject and insufferable pain, pain becomes the universe; thinking through pain otherwise, as in these writings, is thinking through the entire universe itself in terms of suffering. We assume that in general when one 'does' philosophy or science, one speaks from a position of neutrality and/or health, that a degree of detachment from the body is intrinsic. But one might just as well speak from a position of depression or pain or hysteria, and different cosmologies, of the body especially, emerge. Just as cosmology describes at its asymptote the whole of the cosmos, so abject pain describes in a similar position the whole/hole of the body; there's nothing else. For humans, death, dying, and the universe are entangled; Wittgenstein's drawing of the eye interconnects with all cessation of being. In cosmology as well there is constant speculation on the heat death of the planet, the cold simmering out death of the universe, the ending of all life; all of these are interrelated, and birth/life/death histories of the cosmos parallel birth/life/death histories of species. We somehow believe as well that our body is ours, and our universe is ours; we know no others, but speculate on the Other in existentialism (among other domains) and multiverse; everything is both unreachable and apparently reachable, embraceable. And in both, at the heart of the psychology and physiology of bodies and worlds, there are unutterable fears and drives. -

- Alan

On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Monika Weiss wrote:

These are very beautiful summaries of your meditations--reinscriptions,
thank you Alan and Sandy. 
Pain as socially visible and already historical from the point of view of
others, yet unnamable and meaningless within ourselves. Loss of the ability
to signify, to mean, is a shared attribute of pain and mourning. Pain as
embodied union of mind and body, in their indiscernible embrace (when it
hurts it hurts throughout) --- and mourning as an act, a response to the
loss of meaning, to the loss of, breaking of, falling of a part of one self,
the entire self breaking, so that it no longer is capable to comprehend
itself.  

Could you expand on the "pain's relationship to the body as cosmology to the
universe"....

Monika Weiss

On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:12 PM, Charles Baldwin wrote:

      Here's the final part of the dialog (in fact, the notes below
      are largely by Alan). Again, these emerge from the
      kernel/core/chora of the discussion of mourning and grief.  

      110812_004: Pain as separating inscription/history from the
      inertness of the body; what's read as history from the outside
      (and thereby entering the social), from the inside is
      unread/unreadable. The inside is pure substance.

      110812_005: Inscription carries, until burial, carries a
      specific relationship to the body until burial. Burial is a form
      of reinscription. A line on the body - how is this interpreted
      during life? during death?

      110812_012: Inscription => embodiment and maintenance;
      maintenance => retardation: what makes for example virtual
      particles last as long as they do? Retardation - slowing things
      down, copying, duplicating, a poetics of dispersion,
      holding-back. See the phenomenology of numbers: data-base,
      interpretation, intentionality, an immersive situation, memory.
      In doing mathematics, always dealing with temporal processes. In
      pain: everything drops away, definable and immersive situations
      cease to exist.

      110812_014: Splintering, splintered nails, leveraging of
      particles, striations, applicable to notions of binding,
      constriction, discomfort.

      110816_002: Pain of the signifiera: signifier as incision,
      disturbance, splits between the Pale and beyond the Pale. Pain
      beyond the Pale? The pain of death: horizon foreclosing its
      origin and the subject as well.

      110816_003: The work I do as obdurate, not grid or mapping, but
      flows that are not channelized, flows that are mute - relation
      to pain. The phenomenology of the embodiment of the signifier is
      also mute. What I do is planless, expands into available
      technology on a practical level, produces and reproduces that
      way.

      110816_006: My Textbook of Thinking: components of inscription:
      linkage, syntactical structure, inscription is an ordering of
      difference, impulse, representation-structure, legitimation
      structure, maintenance, stabilization mechanisms,
      positive/negative feedback, field of abjection. Excessive
      related to corrosion. Difference between fissure and
      inscription. Relationship of corrosion and scarcity to pain.

      110816_007: Phenomenology of eccentric space, Sarduy,
      de-centering the subject, tied to abjection.

      110816_008: Difference between fissure and inscription; pain
      tends towards fissure; if fissure is same and same, there's no
      geography, no topography, no topology; the result is the crack /
      wound, everywhere and nowhere.

      110818_001: Pain relates to the body as cosmology to the
      universe. (?)

      110819_001: Pain in relation to virtual worlds: in
      circumlocution of the subject who may remain impervious, the
      degree zero of phenomenology.

      110821_001: What happens when users exchange their avatars? Our
      histories, inventories, are no longer our own.


      _______________________________________________
      empyre forum
      empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
      http://www.subtle.net/empyre






==
blog: http://nikuko.blogspot.com/ (main blog)
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/rq.txt
==
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre

Reply via email to