Only problem would be the commit emails being resent (because
technically they are new commits). One can mitigate that by first
pushing them to a dev branch. Commits there have first been there
don't trigger emails.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
<michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the issue where a significant rebase against master is necessary then
> it's trivial enough to either push to a new feature branch or delete and
> re-create the existing branch.
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote:
>
>> As Mike said, the rebase/sync to master is being done locally before
>> the merge. If you are talking about keeping this branch in sync with
>> master constantly while developing, yes it's a problem. But I guess
>> it's not intended for long term features.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
>> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I don't see a difference in the merge process? A feature branch should be
>> > treated exactly the same as master; the only difference is that it's a
>> > branch which people must specifically pull in order to use instead of
>> being
>> > master.
>> >
>> > When merging, you can either do a regular rebase/merge as in the git
>> > practices documentation or you can choose to rebase/squash on the
>> branched
>> > commits prior to pushing the merge. There is no rewriting within the
>> > branch, but you can still rewrite anything which has not been pushed to
>> > master just prior to pushing it to master.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:00 PM Jean-Philippe André <j...@videolan.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey,
>> >>
>> >> If we can't rewrite history on those branches (rebase and push -f), how
>> >> should we proceed with the merge to/from master?
>> >> Usually when we merge a branch to master, we rebase it on top of master
>> >> first and then rebase. That's how our history remains linear and simple.
>> >>
>> >> What's the idea here? I wonder.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for implementing this btw,
>> >>
>> >> 2017-11-21 8:49 GMT+09:00 Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com>:
>> >>
>> >> > I'm not sure about jenkins, that's Stefan's role.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyhow, pushed the changes according to the wiki. Please consider
>> >> > especially mentioning probies when you say "everyone can push to".
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Tom.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
>> >> > <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > I've added all the necessary info to the documentation at
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> https://www.enlightenment.org/contrib/devs/git-guide.md#Feature_Branches
>> >> > >
>> >> > > If the jenkins concept is not possible then feel free to remove, but
>> >> the
>> >> > > rest should be in line with what we want.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:54 AM Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> So what has been decided? What should I do? I need specs,
>> preferably
>> >> > >> already added to the git wiki page so there are docs for this
>> thing.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Carsten Haitzler <
>> >> ras...@rasterman.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> wrote:
>> >> > >> > On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:39:15 +0000 Mike Blumenkrantz
>> >> > >> > <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> said:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> Key points for the implementation:
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> * all commits send mails to the list
>> >> > >> >> * no rewrite of pushed commits
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> Things to consider:
>> >> > >> >> * how are feature/ branches deleted?
>> >> > >> >>  - maybe anyone can delete?
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Good point. these need deletion. after a few years it'll be a
>> mess
>> >> of
>> >> > old
>> >> > >> > feature branches no one will ever look at again. The merge to
>> master
>> >> > >> should
>> >> > >> > contain all the history and log that is needed at that point for
>> >> > history
>> >> > >> > digging.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> * do probies get feature/ push access?
>> >> > >> >>  - seems like they should?
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> > Yeah, good idea.
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > I'll take a look into implementing it soon.
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Williams <
>> >> > a...@andywilliams.me
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >> >> > > Hi,
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> > >> >> > > That sounds great - the ability to work together on features
>> >> > >> off-master
>> >> > >> >> > > would be really helpful.
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> > >> >> > > Andy
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> > >> >> > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 at 16:15, Mike Blumenkrantz <
>> >> > >> >> > > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> > >> >> > >> After some discussions about git organization, it's become
>> >> clear
>> >> > >> to me
>> >> > >> >> > that
>> >> > >> >> > >> we should be trying to enact some changes which facilitate
>> >> > >> >> > collaboration,
>> >> > >> >> > >> both between existing contributors and keeping in mind
>> future
>> >> > >> >> > contributors.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> The current git branch policy is this:
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> * master
>> >> > >> >> > >> * $project-$version
>> >> > >> >> > >> * devs/$name/$branchname
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> No others are allowed. This fits many use cases, but it
>> does
>> >> not
>> >> > >> >> > actually
>> >> > >> >> > >> help us work towards collaborating on features/patchsets
>> and
>> >> > >> instead
>> >> > >> >> > >> promotes developing in isolation.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> A simple proposal could improve this without requiring or
>> >> > >> significantly
>> >> > >> >> > >> changing our workflow: add "feature/" branches. For
>> example,
>> >> if
>> >> > >> Cedric
>> >> > >> >> > and
>> >> > >> >> > >> I decide to work on a "feature" which scrapes the archive
>> of
>> >> > this
>> >> > >> >> > mailing
>> >> > >> >> > >> list and then crashes the session of anyone who replies to
>> >> this
>> >> > >> thread,
>> >> > >> >> > we
>> >> > >> >> > >> might jointly create a branch named
>> >> "feature/discussion_helper"
>> >> > >> and push
>> >> > >> >> > >> commits to it.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> A key point of this proposal would be that the feature/
>> >> branches
>> >> > >> must
>> >> > >> >> > >> trigger mails to the mailing list just like stable
>> branches.
>> >> > This
>> >> > >> would
>> >> > >> >> > >> increase visibility for feature branches as well as promote
>> >> > further
>> >> > >> >> > >> collaboration even from those who are not directly
>> involved in
>> >> > >> creating
>> >> > >> >> > the
>> >> > >> >> > >> feature. The initial feature development could be done in a
>> >> dev/
>> >> > >> branch,
>> >> > >> >> > >> and then it could later move to a feature/ branch once it
>> has
>> >> > >> >> > progressed to
>> >> > >> >> > >> the point where it is ready for public visibility and
>> >> increased
>> >> > >> >> > >> collaboration.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> Lastly, feature branches would not be required use, just
>> >> > >> encouraged.
>> >> > >> >> > This
>> >> > >> >> > >> allows people to continue the current EFL standard of
>> always
>> >> > >> committing
>> >> > >> >> > >> only to master without any prior testing or branching, the
>> >> need
>> >> > for
>> >> > >> >> > which
>> >> > >> >> > >> has defeated other proposals which would prevent such
>> action.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >> I think this could yield significant improvements to the
>> >> > >> community's
>> >> > >> >> > >> overall workflow without massively changing the structure
>> >> under
>> >> > >> which
>> >> > >> >> > the
>> >> > >> >> > >> everyone has been functioning.
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> >> > >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
>> >> most
>> >> > >> >> > >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
>> http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> >> > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> >> > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-
>> >> > devel
>> >> > >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> > > --
>> >> > >> >> > > http://andywilliams.me
>> >> > >> >> > > http://ajwillia.ms
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> >> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
>> most
>> >> > >> >> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> >> > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> >> > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> >> > >
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> >> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
>> most
>> >> > >> >> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> >> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> >> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> >> >
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> > >> >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> >>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > --
>> >> > >> > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
>> >> > --------------
>> >> > >> > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> > >> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> > >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > >> _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> > >>
>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> >
>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > ------------------
>> >> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Philippe André
>> >>
>> >>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >>
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to