On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ... >> So, do you think that it is worth installing and configuring buildbot ? > > go for it, but I'd like to see people who is not developing to setup > and maintain it, loosing developer effort like you to do such task is > not good :-/ Well, actually, I propose that solution. I'm sure that the current trac maintainers or server admins can do that. In a really faster way than me. That is, i didn't plan at all to do these tasks :p People like mekius, Dave or Massimiliano (or other people) know the server side. Maybe they can look at it. They can also find additionnal informations in buildbot's ML or irc chan. > But having automatically builds is good, we could try to integrate > llvm/clang reports as well. interesting idea :) > We still have some warnings that imho are > real errors in both llvm/clang and gcc, and lots of noise from unused > parameters and signed-unsigned comparisons - easy to fix, they should > go as we move on monthly releases. Yes. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
