On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:39:23 +0700 Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> said:
> > Twas brillig at 16:37:14 16.08.2009 UTC+02 when [email protected] did > gyre and gimble: > > >> Those symbols appeared earlier than in 1.2.2, but > >> debian/libeet1.symbols was not updated, so there is no point to look > >> at the actual minimal versions of symbols. > > AT> Actually, it did get updated, SVN just didn't follow: see > AT> > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-e/libs/eet.git;a=history;f=debian/libeet1.symbols;h=deb0e65f90dbb9aa49afb20feb2e0626970aa138;hb=master > > Okay. Maybe it's better then to remove debian/* from SVN to avoid > confusion? hmm. no. debian has this policy of all packages must have their own package files done by debian developers. the problem is there are users out there wanting to make their own packages and don't want to start from scratch. in addition it is an example of how to package the libs - an intended packaging setup from upstream (which bits are modular, which bits are for development, etc. etc.) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
