The singularity-ce incompatible upgrade has now been pushed to stable. This is the final announcement prescribed by the EPEL Incompatible Upgrades Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ Cheers, DT On 9 Feb 2024, at 10:45, David Trudgian <dtr...@sylabs.io> wrote: > > After approval in the last EPEL meeting [1], I have submitted an incompatible > upgrade of singularity-ce to testing for EPEL 7, 8 & 9. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-cbd86d2020 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f299fbc570 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-05e20edbbf > > These updates upgrade singularity-ce from v3.11.5 to v4.1.1. > > The following incompatibilities should be noted by users: > > 1) Some functionality previously provided by the `singularity remote` command > is split into new `singularity registry` and `singularity keyserver` commands. > 2) The `singularity remote add` command now sets a newly added remote as the > default (unless suppressed). Previously the user had to set the default > remote manually. > 3) The deprecated and unmaintained `—vm` flag to start singularity inside a > Virtual Machine has been removed. > > 4) Bind mounts are now performed in the order in which they are specified. > Previously, image based bind mounts were performed before others. > 5) Current working directory on the host is now created in the container, > restoring a behaviour from Singularity <3.6.0 unless suppressed. > 6) If the current directory paths on the container and host contains symlinks > to different locations, the current working directory is not mounted. > > Changes 1,2,3 are expected to have minimal impact, and 4,5,6 are likely to be > considered bug fixes by many users. > > No changes are required to existing configuration files for this update. > > A complete description of changes and additions between v3.11 and v4.1.1 is > available in the upstream documentation at https://sylabs.io/docs/ > > In the absence of any issues, the updates will be pushed to stable after a > one week testing period has passed, with a follow-up notification here. > > Cheers, > > David Trudgian > > > [1] https://pagure.io/epel/issue/265#comment-894790 > -- > _______________________________________________ > epel-announce mailing list -- epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue