From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 13:51:54 -0400
To: ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [IP] Where Have All the CDs Gone?


------ Forwarded Message
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Where Have All the CDs Gone?


(disclosure: this was pointed out to me by Fred von Lohmann of EFF...
It is a great debunking of the RIAA's claim that their recentrevenue
hits are due to "piracy".)


Where Have All the CDs Gone?

The record industry blames piracy and downloading for sagging sales
here's the whole story.

By James K. Willcox

Turn on the radio and chances are youll hear a top-selling song from a
rock, country, or hip-hop artist. But stroll through the offices of
almost any major record label and youll hear an entirely different
kind of music: the blues. After nearly a decade of unfettered growth,
music sales are down for the second year in a row. And if the
Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is to be believed,
downloads and piracy are the verse and the chorus of the music
industrys current sad song.

By the Numbers
Placing the blame for declining sales on downloads and peer-to-peer
file-sharing networks would appear to make sense. After all, just a
few years ago, when downloading was still relegated to a few students
in dorm rooms, recorded-music sales were booming. Since 2000, however,
sales have been falling while activity on file-sharing networks has
exploded  and the RIAA believes thats no coincidence. Although
music-industry lawsuits effectively neutered early file-sharing
networks like Napster and Aimster, others  like KaZaA, WinMX, and
iMesh  have popped up in whack-a-mole fashion, leading many to believe
the genie is already out of the bottle and can no longer be contained.
KaZaA, for example, now boasts more than 200 million users, and
traffic across all file-sharing sites has reached over three billion
music downloads each month.

So its not surprising that the record industry sees downloading as the
main cause of its ills. In a report issued last August, the RIAA
placed the blame for the slump squarely on the shoulders of those who
trade ripped files of copyrighted songs. The organization cited a
survey, conducted last May by Peter D. Hart Research Associates, it
said provided the strongest evidence to date that downloading is
displacing sales.

In the survey of 860 Internet-connected music consumers between 12 and
54, those who downloaded more and bought fewer CDs outnumbered those
who both downloaded and purchased more CDs by two to one. While
conceding that things like the overall decline in consumer spending
could be playing a role, RIAA president Cary Sherman called
downloading the main culprit in the drop in sales, adding that this
data should dispel any notion that illegal file sharing helps the
music industry. Sherman also noted the dramatic rise in the number of
people whove acquired burned CDs, although it wasnt clear whether
acquired meant purchased or received from a friend.

The RIAA also said that the total value of music shipments for all
formats had fallen from a high of nearly $14.6 billion in 1999 to
$12.6 billion in 2002. The number of CDs, cassettes, LPs, and so on
shipped from warehouses fell 10.3% in 2001 and 11.2% in 2002. CD
sales, by far the largest category in the statistics, dropped 6.4% in
2001 and almost 9% in 2002. These statistics for units shipped jibe
with those from Nielsen SoundScan, which tracks actual retail sales.
SoundScan reports that CD sales, which made up 94% of music sales in
2002, declined 8.7% that year.

New Math
While few dispute the numbers, some, such as George Ziemann, are
challenging the RIAAs inferences from them. Ziemann, an Arizona-based
musician and owner of MacWizards, a music production company, was
propelled into the debate when he wasnt able to sell his bands CDs via
online auctions on sites such as eBay, Amazon, and Yahoo because they
were burned on recordable CD-Rs. Ziemann says he was told that because
CD-Rs are often used to record pirated material, theyre banned on many
auction sites as a result of the RIAAs antipiracy efforts (eBay allows
CD-R sales if the seller stipulates he owns the copyright).

As a result of that experience, Ziemann researched the RIAAs figures
and came to very different conclusions, released in a much-circulated
article, The RIAAs Statistics Dont Add Up, posted on his Web site
(azoz.com). He makes two key assertions: 1) that the labels raised CD
prices during a down economy, and 2) that they slashed the number of
new releases by almost 25% during the past three years. He says that
these factors, and not downloading, are responsible for sluggish CD
sales.

To arrive at the first conclusion, Ziemann took the RIAAs numbers for
the retail value of CDs sold and divided it by the units shipped to
determine an average CD price. He found that prices have steadily
increased, from an average of $12.05 in 1990 to $14.23 in 2001.
Although the numbers for 2002 werent available when Ziemann did his
analysis, using the same formula we determined that the average CD
price reached $14.99 in 2002. But when you exclude the promotionally
priced CDs sold through record clubs or nonmusic stores like Starbucks
and The Gap, the average price rose from $14.31 in 1998 to $17.09 in
2002 (click for "The Big Picture" graphic sidebar ).

Ziemann supports his contention that labels are releasing fewer new CD
titles by using the RIAAs market data through 1999  it inexplicably
stopped issuing these numbers in 2000. Combining this with an RIAA
press release entitled The Value of a CD that said 27,000 new releases
hit the market each year, he constructed a graph showing that releases
fell 25% over two years, from a high of 38,900 in 1999 to 27,000 in
2001. SoundScans numbers show new releases falling from 38,857 in 1999
to 31,734 in 2001, a 20% drop. Although its latest figures show
releases increasing to 33,443 in 2002, that is still 14% below 1999s
peak number.

In Ziemanns assessment, the combination of fewer releases and higher
prices  not free downloads  caused sales to slump. His argument is
bolstered by Josh Bernoff, an analyst at Forrester Research, who
pointed out in a report issued last August that this isnt the first
time booming CD sales have plunged. For instance, during the recession
in 1991  long before anyone even knew what a download was  CD sales
growth fell from 15% to 4%. When you consider that the countrys gross
domestic product (GDP) declined 36% in 2002 and the S&P 500 dropped an
equally depressing 28.78% during the same period, the recent 9%
decline in sales doesnt seem so dramatic  particularly for a format
thats been around for 20 years.

short link: http://www.shorl.com/bemygesomove

long link: http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/article.asp?
print_page=y&section_id=2&article_id=453&page_number=1&preview=



(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.)


Reply via email to