On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: > >> Brendan Eich wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: >>>> The old ES4 grammar is machine-verified LR(1). It's on: >>>> >>>> http://www.mozilla.org/js/language/old-es4/ >>> One based on ES3 would be helpful for ES3.1 and Harmony. Someone >>> needs to invest effort here. If not you, who? This is as good a >>> time as any to call for capable potential volunteers to scope the >>> work and, if they are willing, and step forward. >> >> I'll do it for both. For Harmony it's not clear what's in and out >> at this point, so I'm somewhat at a loss as to what to put in there. > > Testing ideas from http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:strawman > pages and (other than let expressions,
Or (in the case of http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:lambdas) lambda with expression body syntax, as opposed to block body syntax. /be > which are already found > wanting) validating or invalidating them would be most helpful. > Thanks, > > /be > _______________________________________________ > Es-discuss mailing list > Es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
