The for/of iterators solve this nicely. This is definitely something that
comes up a lot though, and this seems like a very handy cowpath to pave. If
it were spec'd I'd suggest the naming and argument values should align with
the for/of variants.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> it comes out from time to time devs would like to have `Object.values()`
> as equivalent of `Object.keys()` except the returned array would contain
> values.
>
> Better than repeated
> `Object.keys(obj).map(function(p){return this[k];}, obj);`
> all over
>
> but probably less useful than a more generic `Object.forEach(obj,
> callback, thisValue)` where `callback` would receive `(value, key,
> originalObject)` and `thisValue` as context.
>
> This is consistent with `Array#forEach` and could simplify `for/in` loops
> passing over own enumerable properties only, as keys would do.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
