On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:10 PM, <br...@mailed.me.uk> wrote: > I believe await* has gone from the spec. The correct form would be (at the > top-level): >
True, I guess `await*` never made it to the proposal's formal text. It still worked in Babel the last time I checked, though. FWIW, `await* []` would desugar to `await Promise.all([])`. > The mistake in Dimitry's example is that the async body was not resolved, > not that anonymous async functions are in some way invalid - they're just > fine. > I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. I see that the outer synchronous function would not await until the async function finished—i.e. the outer function would return before the promise was resolved/settled—, but that is still valid syntax—you could be running the async code for side-effects that the caller context does not need to be aware of. You mentioned this was invalid syntax, and that was the initial point I addressed. :) /fm
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
