On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 08:54 AM, Ben Barrett wrote:
The initial point I tried to make in this thread, is that people have
opted into how they use SpamAssasin, right? I'm not sure of the EFN
setup, so need some clarification. So, everyone gets it, but everyone
can have a personal configuration for spam-filtering, yes? So in this
case, as in many other spam-filtering setups, it would be wise to KEEP
any messages that the mail robot decides are spam. No matter how good,
in our day an age there is NO sure-fire way to filter spam with 100%
accuracy -- although many vendors of big-money filters would like you to
believe otherwise.
This is basically the AI problem, in order for a program to match your tastes, it would have to BE you.
I think we are going to see a move toward more and more mailservers that won't accept mail from uncertified sources, you willl need to present a valid certificate to any relay
and it will need to be signed by a trusted root.
(this should make intel happy (more crypto means more CPU))
"Microsoft has resolved this issue. We have put processes in place to ensure there is no recurrence of this eventuality." -Microsoft
"You are the eventuality of an anomaly , which despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. " -The Architect
_______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
