On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:33 PM, David Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008, Douglas Napoleone wrote:
>
>> I don't think the proposal was for this information being in the
>> repository. There should not be any reason for financial information on
>> this level being in a repository for conference materials to be shared
>> between multiple yearly conferences.
>
> There was also some talk of re-using software as well, so I see the
> scope for mistakes that John was talking about, even if good practices
> are being followed, as you suggest.
Question: What about having software like the badge generation as its
own standalone project? I am sure more than just the python community
could benefit from such an application, and having the project
independent of a 'conference core' will greatly help with its
development and maintenance.
At least that is my recent experience with PyCon-Tech. the few spin
off projects are doing great, and I plan on breaking the remaining
pieces into separate projects as well.
The survey application has 4 active developers and is being used on 5
sites, none of which are conference related, the RSS feed manager is
being used by 8 sites that I know of, again none are conference
related, and the list goes on. When these were all part of just the
PyCon-Tech massive code base, I was the only one working on it, and
was ignored as being too big and confusing (both true).
My end goal is now to do away with PyCon-Tech completely.
Just a thought.
-Doug
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Europython-improve mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
>
_______________________________________________
Europython-improve mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
