Hello, 2008/12/11 M.-A. Lemburg <[email protected]>: > On 2008-12-11 10:15, Yusdi Santoso wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Thanks again for all of the feedback. I suppose this would be a final draft >> (or 0.9 release) of the poster. I am thinking of creating another >> accompanying A4 page to explain what Python and EuroPython are all about. >> Does anyone have any write up for this or should I grab it from the existing >> website? > > Wouldn't it be better to use the same font and style as on the original logo: > > http://europython.org/euro/img/europython.png > > The version on the poster looks too much like a new logo, IMHO. > >> PS: the local people at Birmingham, does anyone have a nice shot of the >> venue?? > > You probably don't want a picture of the venue itself :-) It's a rather > unexciting piece of concrete:
I can confirm that :) It's being knocked down in three years time and will be moving to a 'new and exciting' modern venue. > http://livebrum.co.uk/images/Birmingham_Conservatoire.jpg > > This page has a view images of the interior: > > http://www.pyconuk.org/venue.html You might find something useful at http://gallery3.pyconuk.org/2008/ The finest pictures the delegates could muster. I like the duck-typing bridge. Good picture of fuzzyman to ;) Best wishes, John -- >> Could someone try printing the poster on A4? Does it print ok? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Yusdi >>> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:02:44 +0000> From: [email protected]> To: >>> [email protected]> Subject: Re: [Europython-improve] Updated poster> CC: >>> [email protected]> > 2008/12/10 Yusdi Santoso >>> <[email protected]>:> > Hi guys,> >> > Here is the updated poster. I guess >>> this is sort of a compromise based on> > the various feedbacks. Let me know >>> what you think.> > I like the way you've incorporated the logo.> > > I >>> understand that the poster doesn't have to have a white bg, but at the> > >>> moment it conveys the message quite well and reasonably nice.> > > Do we >>> not need other content in the poster (like the types of talk, etc)?> > >>> Probably, but maybe it would spoil your design concept.> > BTW, we need to >>> be pointing people to www.europython.eu.> > europython.org is owned by >>> someone else, and we have no control over> it. Until this is resolved we >>> should be using the .eu domain (it seems> more appropriate anyway).> > >>> Thanks,> > John> -- >> _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
