On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> > You have added the UTM and its variants to the pile. Any of these could be > just as right as you think COMP is. > > > I have no idea about the truth status of Digital Mechanism, except nothing > in nature suggest it to be false. On the contrary, the main startling > consequence of digital mechanism (non locality, first person indeterminacy, > symmetry at the bottom, etc.) are confirmed by the empirical study of > nature. But I am open to the idea that comp may be false. That is why I > study it: to show it falsifiable and thus scientific in Popper sense. > > Bruno, The part about symmetry at the bottom being a consequence of mechanism intrigued me. How is symmetry at the bottom related to mechanism? Thanks, Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
