On 2/10/2017 9:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Feb 2017, at 05:07, Brent Meeker wrote:
This fails to consider the holographic model of the universe. In the
bulk model the energy density of the vacuum is overestimated by the
ratio of the Hubble volume to it's boundary area (both in Planck
units). The holographic model may not be right - but it shows that
it's silly to regard the failure to find supersymmetry as proving
fine-tuning. There are other possibilities.
Interesting. Could you explain or refer to some link how the
holographic model (theory) does that, thanks.
The idea comes from my later friend Vic Stenger. He discussed it in his
book "The Fallacy of Fine Tuning" and thanks to Amazon you can read
chapter 12 online:
https://www.amazon.com/Fallacy-Fine-Tuning-Why-Universe-Designed/dp/1616144432
Brent
Bruno
Brent
On 2/9/2017 7:27 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/read-offline/4739/20130524-is-nature-unnatural.print
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.