> Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 15.38 agrayson2...@gmail.com ha scritto:
> 
> 
> 
>     On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 10:14:32 AM UTC, scerir wrote:
> 
>         > > 
> > 
> >             > > > Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 10.19 agrays...@gmail.com ha 
> > scritto:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >             On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 2:14:48 PM UTC, scerir 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >                 > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >                     > > > > > Il 15 novembre 2018 alle 14.29 
> > > > agrays...@gmail.com ha scritto:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >                     On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 8:04:53 AM UTC, 
> > > > > scerir wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >                         > > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         Imagine a spin-1/2 particle described by 
> > > > > > the state psi = sqrt(1/2) [(s+)_z + (s-)_z] .
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         If the x-component of spin is measured by 
> > > > > > passing the spin-1/2 particle through a Stern-Gerlach with its 
> > > > > > field oriented along the x-axis, the particle will ALWAYS emerge 
> > > > > > 'up'.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                     > > > > > 
> > > > >                     Why?  Won't the measured value be along the x 
> > > > > axis in both directions, in effect Up or Dn? AG
> > > > > 
> > > > >                 > > > > 
> > > >                 "Hence we must conclude that the system described by 
> > > > the |+>x state is not the
> > > >                 same as a mixture of atoms in the |+> and !-> states. 
> > > > This means that each atom in the
> > > >                 beam is in a state that itself is a combination of the 
> > > > |+> and |-> states. A superposition
> > > >                 state is often called a coherent superposition since 
> > > > the relative phase of the two terms is
> > > >                 important."
> > > > 
> > > >                 .see pages 18-19 here https://tinyurl.com/ybm56whu
> > > > 
> > > >             > > > 
> > >             Try answering in your own words. When the SG device is 
> > > oriented along the x axis, now effectively the z-axix IIUC, and we're 
> > > dealing with superpositions, the outcomes will be 50-50 plus and minus. 
> > > Therefore, unless I am making some error, what you stated above is 
> > > incorrect. AG
> > > 
> > >         > > 
> >         sqrt(1/2) [(s+)_z +(s-)_z]  is a superposition, but since sqrt(1/2) 
> > [(s+)_z +(s-)_z]  =  (s+)_x the particle will always emerge 'up'
> > 
> >     > 
>     I'll probably get back to on the foregoing. In the meantime, consider 
> this; I claim one can never MEASURE Up + Dn or Up - Dn with a SG apparatus 
> regardless of how many other instruments one uses to create a composite 
> measuring apparatus (Bruno's claim IIUC). The reason is simple. We know that 
> the spin operator has exactly two eigenstates, each with probability of .5. 
> We can write them down. We also know that every quantum measurement gives up 
> an eigenvalue of some eigenstate. Therefore, if there existed an Up + Dn or 
> Up - Dn eigenstate, it would have to have probability ZERO since the Up and 
> Dn eigenstates have probabilities which sum to unity. Do you agree or not, 
> and if not, why? TIA, AG
> 

I think the question should rather be how to prepare a superposition state like 
 sqrt(1/2) [(s+)_z +(s-)_z] . But when you have this specific state, and when 
you orient the SG along "x", you always get "up".

> 
>         > > 
> >             > > > 
> > >                 > > > > 
> > > >                  
> > > > 
> > > >                     > > > > >                      
> > > > > 
> > > > >                         > > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         In fact (s+)_z = sqrt(1/2) [(s+)_x + (s-)_x]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         and (s-)_z = sqrt(1/2) [(s+)_x - (s-)_x]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         (where _z, _x, are the z-component and the 
> > > > > > x-component of spin)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         so that psi = sqrt(1/2)[(s+)_z +(s-)_z] = 
> > > > > > (s+)_x.   (pure state, not mixture state)..
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         AGrayson2000 asked "If a system is in a 
> > > > > > superposition of states, whatever value measured, will be repeated 
> > > > > > if the same system is repeatedly measured.  But what happens if the 
> > > > > > system is in a mixed state?"
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                         Does Everett's "relative state 
> > > > > > interpretation" show how to interpret a real superposition (like 
> > > > > > the above, in which the particle will always emerge 'up') and how 
> > > > > > to interpret a mixture (in which the particle will emerge 50% 'up' 
> > > > > > or 50% 'down')?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >                     > > > > > 
> > > > >                      
> > > > > 
> > > > >                     --
> > > > >                     You received this message because you are 
> > > > > subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> > > > >                     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving 
> > > > > emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >                     To post to this group, send email to 
> > > > > everyth...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >                     Visit this group at 
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list .
> > > > >                     For more options, visit 
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/optout https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> > > > > .
> > > > > 
> > > > >                 > > > > 
> > > >             > > > 
> > >              
> > > 
> > >             --
> > >             You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> > > Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> > >             To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
> > > it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
> > >             To post to this group, send email to 
> > > everyth...@googlegroups.com.
> > >             Visit this group at 
> > > https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> > > https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list .
> > >             For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> > > https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
> > > 
> > >         > > 
> >     > 
>      
> 
>     --
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>     To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com 
> mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com .
>     Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>     For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to