I was going to suggest lynching some spammers, but that entails a certain amount of risk, so I'll just second your Barracuda recommendation...
Kurt On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Kennedy, Jim <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org> wrote: > Barracuda. Been a very happy customer of theirs for 15 years or so. The > have appliances of different sizes, I prefer that route, VM’s or even in the > cloud if you are into that kind of thing. > > > > Best vendor support I have ever had. > > > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale > Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 4:17 PM > To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [Exchange] Spam solutions > > > > I have a company I do work for where I am planning a windows server > 2008r2/exchange 2013 upgrade to windows server 2016/exchange 2016 in the new > year. > > That being said, they currently use forefront for exchange and it is my > understanding that will go away. It’s also not the most inspiring product > really… > > > > They want a more complete spam solution than what we already use (postfix > rules on a gateway) so I need to acquire something that I can use after the > upgrade. > > > > What are people currently recommending for 50 user sites? I am open to > recommendations, historically I blocked spam before it hit the exchange > server however I am open to placing that and the AV on the exchange server. > The only nice to have is a user accessible way to un-quarantine a message on > their own. > > > > Anyone have any opinions? > > > > Thanks! > jlc
