The active answers section of Compaq's website does. It'd over a year old now though and thus not really relevant anymore. But it sounds like external validation is more important than internal testing. I can recommend some folks to write you a fairly unbiased report on the current technologies for Exchange 5.5. They'll certainly be less biased than say... a PC magazine roundup on the subject.
Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change > > > > And I am trying to convince my supervisor to not use > InoculateIT and use Sybari's Antigen instead... but, as you > already know, that isn't an easy task... > > So, I beg you: please give me some link to a website/document > that compares antivirus for exchange server 5.5, so I can > show my superiors the mistake they are doing!! > > I guess the new version of InoculateIT (eTrust InoculateIT > 6.0, if i'm not > mistaken) is better than version 4... but I still consider > Antigen better than InoculateIT. > > Thanks! > > > > Ok, I am trying to convince my Supervisor to switch from > InoculateIT > > to Antigen. Can someone point me to their website so that > I can get > > some more information about the product and get my research > started. > > Both my mail servers are Nt 4.0 w/SP6a, running Exchange 5.5 w/SP4 > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
