Be careful – Active/Active
clustering with automatic fail over has known memory fragmentation issues that
could cause a failure of your IS to start. Our Microsoft resident suggests manual fail over. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics
Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -----Original
Message----- Hmmmm How about being
able to test a service pack without effecting users at any time day or
night? Is that not an advantage? How about very
high availability? How about
redundant hardware (ya, I know it's redundant to the HA thing) I will agree
that the 2000AS cluster is much better than 4.0EE, but 4.0EE works great in my
book. -----Original Message----- For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you
gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5 isn't truly "cluster
aware". For XCHG2000 I say DAH - "IF"
you have a solid cluster solution with known HCL Server hardware. I recommend
Compaq's cluster solutions as I have the most/best experiences with it overall
and the FIBRE channel connectivity is SWEET. XCHG2000 is cluster aware. Plan to spend lotsomoney on your hardware
however.. it ain't cheap. -Rick My immediate supervisor mentioned that
when we finally get new Exchange List Charter and FAQ at: List Charter and FAQ at: List Charter
and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm |
Title: Message
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Bert Macias
- RE: Clustering Exchange Scot Parsons
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Arnold, Jamie
- RE: Clustering Exchange Lefkovics, William
- RE: Clustering Exchange Lefkovics, William
- RE: Clustering Exchange Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Clustering Exchange Gerald BAI (NCS)
- RE: Clustering Exchange MHR(Michael Ross)
- RE: Clustering Exchange Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Clustering Exchange Kopec, David