>>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. 
 
Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. 
 
Active/Passive is best for now.
 
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange

I'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/active
cluster.   I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.
Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers.  We have
7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers.   We
never have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at all
times.  What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,
SMtp logs, etc...)

I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to a
Compaq MA6000 storageworks unit.

We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.

Any suggestion would be appreciated.


Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

  Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Exchange 2000 FAQ:
  http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to