On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Niklas Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought it was your suggestion? :)
Was it? If so, I apologize :( > Anyway, I agree it might be > cleaner with e.g. a 'match' kw (that can take a string *or* > precompiled regexp I suppose).. > > And skip the callable-tests for validate (if it's not None, it should > be called). Not the least since we have no "callable" in Python 3.. > > Any votes on if I should rework it like this? I'd like to hear Christian's feedback, and I think I may also do some research to see what the general consensus is among the Python community, about this sort of thing. I could see it going either way but I'm sure someone smarter than me has already weighed the pluses and minuses and figured out which is cleaner. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
