Björn Lindqvist <bjou...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi! > > Is that it's only use? Then why? dip can easily be formulated using > non-retain stack using primitives: > > For example: "a" "b" "c" [ append ] dip -> "a" "b" "c" -rot append swap
What if the contents of the quotation use more than one item from the stack? How would you implement [ + ] dip, for example? Or [ + + ] dip? etc. etc. Rupert
pgpDjqZUFweIY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
