--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruthsimplicity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > ROFLOLSTMITB > > (Rollingonthefloorwithlaughterscaringthemiceinthebasement) > > > > No baby, I hang around here to get a good laugh. :-) > > > Well, I hope we are good entertainment for you!
Sometimes, definately yes :-) But I do question > your stated motives because we really are not that funny. Interesting > yes, but funny no. I also find 1-2 people here interesting. > > I have some serious questions for you if you wouldn't mind climbing up > off that floor after rolling around and doing all that laughing: > > Do you think that the TMOs, or any specific TMO, has any ethical > obligations to meditators? No. How about to you specifically? Not at all. I am responsible for my own evolution and actions. > > Do you think that the TMOs, or any specific TMO, has any ethical > obligations to donees? None whatsoever. > > If yes, what do you think those obligations are? > > Do you think that the TMOs have a duty to disclose to contributors how > their money will be spent? No, why should they ? When money is given, to anyone, anywhere its given and gone. > > Do you think that the TMOs have a duty to tell the truth if in fact > they do disclose how money is spent? Absolutely not. BTW; I question your idea about "truth". > > If John Hagelin, as Raja of the US, told you that you must do > something for a TMO, would you feel obliged to do it? To a certain degree, yes. Would it depend > on what he asked you to do? No, it would depend on my time on hand. > > Please answer if you can. I am not looking for a fight. >
