Is this it? 

 As I showed in my review of their book The Grand Design 
http://nrd.nationalreview.com/?q=MjAxMDExMjk= for National Review, Stephen 
Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow are no more philosophically competent than Siegel 
is.  Indeed, one of their errors is the same as Siegel’s: They tell us that 
“Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can and will create itself 
from nothing.”  Ignore for the moment the incoherence of the notion of 
self-causation (which we explored recently here 
http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2010/12/dreaded-causa-sui.html and here 
http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2010/12/causal-loops-infinite-regresses-and.html).
  Put to one side the question of whether the physics of their account is 
correct.  Forget about where the laws of physics themselves are supposed to 
have come from.  Just savor the manifest contradiction: The universe comes from 
nothing, because a law like gravity is responsible for the universe.
 
If this is it, it's wrong because...?
 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 I can't find the Hawking post on Feser's blog. Do you perhaps have a link? He 
did publish a review of Hawking's book on National Review Online; could that be 
where you saw it? It was apparently for subscribers only. Are you a subscriber 
to NRO?
 

 It's on Mr Ed's blog somewhere, not as an essay in itself but mentioned on one 
his many pages...
 

 Hawking's contention that philosophy is dead is a rather obvious nonstarter. 
It's been soundly refuted by a host of philosophers (including Feser) and even 
some scientists.
 

 Mr Ed didn't like it? Stone me!
 

 It must be great having all these amazing minds doing your thinking for you.
 

 

 I don't take your mangling of Feser's name seriously. I just think it's 
juvenile.
 

 Heh, heh..
 

 BTW, did you notice that Curtis doesn't go along with your metaphysical 
scientistic assertion that only what is measurable is real?
 

 Good for him. And it's supposed to affect me how? 
 

 

 Here's a question for you:
 

 Try assuming that this classical god theory is wrong and whatever it is that 
it does - or did - stops, or never started. In what way is the universe 
different? 
 

 When I say "the universe" I mean everything in it, us, our lives, pasts, 
futures. Everything. What do we lose without this fabulous thing you guys are 
so into?
 

 












 




Reply via email to