ITS a rt to so remain but is never considered consent in even common law
-----Original Message-----
From: 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Sep 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Proposal, An Amendment to FFL Guidelines:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<sharelong60@...> wrote :
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for
making this point. Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree
with you that silence implies agreement. Heck, a person
could be unresponsive to a post simply because
they haven't read it! Or maybe it hasn't even
arrived in their inbox!
Also, if I've been away from the computer for some time,
I can have as many as 90 emails when I return.
There's no way I'm gonna read every post much less
reply to them.
Last but not least, I've come to realize that nobody is
gonna be changing the opinions of anybody else on
FFL. So I post for other reasons.
>
On 9/29/2014 9:27 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Hmm, I assumed he was making a point about the letter from
JH, the bit about "consent" gave it away - maybe I was
wrong. In which case they are both wrong or right,
it depends on the individual, but Willy likes to
assume people are in agreement with him so he naturally
projects that as the reason they don't respond.
>
Actually "Willy" assumes that some people don't respond because they
are nodding off after smoking a pipe late at night. It was Judy that first
posted that in an online conversation silence usually indicates agreement
- where she is from.
>
On Monday, September 29, 2014 7:36 AM,
"dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Therule defines consent as "an
affirmative, conscious and
voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity
in FFL forum discussion I feel we
should adopt the California
decorum for discussion and drop away from
the Texas norm.
Silence should no longer mean agreement
here and that Henceforth and Forever more
in the
discussions on FF,
thatsilence or a lack of resistance
do not in fact constitute
consent.
What do you feel about this?
Jai Guru Dev,
-Buck in the Dome
