From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 9:01 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inner Circle Breakout on "Girls"
> > The real question is, what is the implication > > of all of this, given such incidents are true? > > Rick Archer wrote: > What do you think the implication is? > Well, I think that the implications are: 1. MMY wasn't in India in 1973 - he was laying down on a cot in La Antilla, Spain, according to Jennifer. Are you as confused as you seem, or are you just joking around in order to avoid dealing seriously with a serious issue? As we've said before, the story was told in 1973. The alleged incident happened in Rishikesh, which would have had to be late '60's. 2. MMY didn't have a hairdresser, according to Tom Anderson. There was always someone around who cut people's hair. Ron Nacthway was doing it for years. 3. SIMS wasn't hiring hairdressers in 1973, according to Jerry Jarvis. Ron wasn't employed by SIMS to cut hair. He just did it while on staff, and people paid him. He may have cut MMY's hair too - probably did - or we may be referring to someone else. 4. There was no door to MMY's room at Rishikesh - he lived on a porch, according to Nancy. He lived in a house which had a porch. See http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/photos/view/1653?b=8 5. This incident isn't mentioned by Joyce Collin-Smith in her book "Call No Man Master". Is that the final, comprehensive authority on the subject?
