--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tanhlnx" <tanhlnx@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --Vaj, you're attempting to divert attention from the real by > > > > creating strawmen and bringing up practically unattainable > > > > goals. > > > > For one thing, Gurus who have attained a Rainbow Light Body are > > > > exceedingly rare, and I challenge you to bring up instances in > > > > which > > > > they regularly appear in people's dreams. > > > > OTOH, countless people have experienced the Shakti of MMY, SBS, > > > > and Ramana Maharshi. > > > > > > Again, just playing Deva's Advocate here, is it > > > possible that what these countless numbers of > > > people experienced was simple infinity, without > > > form, and they *interpreted* it in the form of > > > the teacher they were most familiar with? > > > > Why are you assuming people are always at the mercy of their > > subconscious filters? Its a perspective you take a lot. > > Uh, possibly because I have never met an individual > on this planet, *including* the ones I suspect of > being enlightened, who did *not* have their filters > firmly in place. It's just part of living. >
I mean, in MMY's SCI he makes it clear that enlightened folks are a product of their culture and interpret their enlightenment in terms of that culture. Doesn't sound like they "rise above" their filters. And of course, from what we know of the human nervous system, how could they? Pure Consciousness or Self may not have filers, but it is still a living nervous system that acts.
