--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <premanandpaul@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have had (friendly) emails on the side from quite a few of the > > > > > posters here, and it is disturbing to see some of you post 'hate' > > > mail > > > > > against critics of Maharishi. Actually, it is quite possible > to be > > > > > critical of someone without hating him. But anyway, I suspect > you are > > > > > in good company as Maharishi has never been good at dealing with > > > > > criticism, so I guess he deserves to be represented by you and > > > your ilk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is an ilk? > > > > > > > > > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ilk > > > > It was a rhetorical question, but thanks. ;-) > > > > Sorry. I thought perhaps that is a primarily British > English word... :] >
Nyah. I was just asking what is an "ilk" in the context of "you and your ilk."
