Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla <l...@jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <l...@jcomserv.net> 2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT --- Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
