Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: >> Absolutely, I've got a Thinkpad T42 here that does just fine on fedora 10. >> Unless of course, I try to load a PAE enabled kernel on it. >> >> I've not looked into it at all, but this thread got me thinking, is there any >> particular reason that we can't merge the pae and non-pae kernels using the >> same >> alternatives approach we used to merge smp & up? >> > > I looked into this several years ago, it's actually fairly gnarly since > depending on PAE we set up the swapper page tables differently, and > other ugly differences. > > I should resurrect the patch set, though I think rationalizing it with the > Xen merge might be more pain than it's worth... last time I looked at it > there was a ridiculous amount of rejects.
Well, it depends on if you are talking about the non-upstream Xen patch, or the current upstream pv_ops. The former is all but dead, so you don't have to worry about that, and the latter *should* (famous last words) mostly stay out of your way through pv_ops. Though I haven't gone in and implemented it myself, so it's easy for me to say :). I think choosing PAE at runtime would be the ideal situation, if we can get there. -- Chris Lalancette _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
