On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:13:34 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that seemed like an easy answer at the time, but is there a better > choice? i realize stabs is still common but, in terms of being > technically advanced, is DWARF 2 the most informative and most useful > of the formats? thanks. Well, there is the DWARF standards document, then there is the debug info gcc/g++ generates, which is in many ways somewhat similar, but as part of the overall linux conspiracy to make the lives of developers who work on debuggers a living hell, gcc often deviates in interesting ways (sez this debugger developer :-). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
