On 06/21/2009 08:35 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:53:58 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 06/21/2009 12:05 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
The syslinux patch provides "default-{x86_64,i386}" keywords in isolinux.cfg.
...
It does not make much sense to me, so maybe you can explain it:
Isn't syslinux 3.72 or later itself capable of choosing one or the other
menu entry using ifcpu64.c32?
Would that not be a better option?
yes, definitely, my syslinux patch is useless.
I did not expect such option exists when such ISO still has not been released
while waiting for it the recent years.
So yeah, the problem we get with i386/x86_64 hybrids is more that we
would reduce the available size to either of the Live images to half a
CD or half a DVD. Some of our spins fit on half a DVD, but not half a
CD. If some spins have separate media for each arch, and others do not,
then that may work confusing.
That said though, I don't think we've had this kinda thing discussed or
decided upon... so it's a good point ;-)
-Jeroen
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
