On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:36 PM Tomas Härdin <g...@haerdin.se> wrote: > > tis 2023-07-25 klockan 16:18 +0200 skrev Thilo Borgmann: > > Am 25.07.23 um 14:24 schrieb Tomas Härdin: > > > > + // Extremely simplified key frame detection: > > > > + // - the first frame (containing headers) is marked as a key > > > > frame > > > > + // - other frames are marked as non-key frames > > > > > > Is there a more proper way of doing this? > > > > All frames (except the ANMF chunks) are INTRA, and all of them have a > > WEBP tag. > > Whereas all ANMF chunks are in the same WEBP chunk as their reference > > frame. > > So it should really be as simple as it is to mark all WEBP frames as > > key frames as the code does. > > What more dedicated do you have in mind? > > Nah mostly just curious. It just feels so weird when VP8 intra already > exists. Maybe I'm missing something. Browsers already support VP8 after > all. >
We wanted something lighter weight (memory, cpu) for an image format rather than going full blown video. Lossless also factored into this. > > The logic as-is works with all samples I have, animated and not. > > Seems to also align well with their example file layouts. > > You have a more weird one? > > Nope _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".