> Hmm. The root certificates are IMHO, facts. There's only one set of > root certificates-- or at least there should be, else the whole system > of trust chains would fall apart. I.e Debian gets a certificate from a > organization which certifies that the holders of the Debian private > key is Debian, and that certifying organization gets a certificate from > someone else who is in turn certifed by another, until the root is > found. Theoretically, someone could publish an additional root > certificate, and if a user were naive enough to trust that root > certificate, malicious individuals could pass themselves off as > various entities deserving as trust. So, copyrighting and licensing a > set of "root certificates" would seem to be counterproductive.
Is it acceptable to delete "License:" field simply? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
