We currently have pango1, pango1-xft2, and pango1-xft2-ft219 sets. The
"plain" pango1-{dev,shlibs} packages appears to be a legacy bundle set
from when we had xft1 and xft2 variants. Now we only have xft2; does
the bundle serve a purpose any more? Do we actually expect to have
future new pango1 variants that are binary-compatible for which we
would again want a bundle? If not, any objections to declaring
pango1-{dev,shlibs} obsolete, migrating packages' deps to the "real"
underlying pango1-xft2-{dev,shlibs} packages, and eventually removing
pango1-{dev,shlibs} from the 10.3 and 10.4T unstable branches?dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
