Jack Howarth wrote:
Oddly I see to see that when fink links liblam.0.0.0.dylib with gcc called as gcc-4.0, I have...gcc-4.0 -dynamiclib ${wl}-undefined ${wl}dynamic_lookup -o .libs/liblam.0.0.0.dylib ...etc whereas when I build lam 7.1.1 manually I end up with... gcc -dynamiclib ${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined ${wl}suppress -o .libs/liblam.0.0.0.dylib ...etc which is very strange since the default compiler is set to gcc-4.0 in both cases. The first case produced the liblam.0.0.0.dylib which had the additional /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib linked in compared to the second case which didn't. Jack This is strange also because the libtool calls in both cases seem identical...
[]
It is curious that they produce such different linkages.
Different libtool versions in /sw and in /usr? -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
