Martin Costabel wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >> If somebody would be kind enough to look at these, I would much >> appreciate it--I'm not sure how long it's going to take for me to get >> connectivity. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: New clisp version; maxima needs to get updated >> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:08:16 -0800 >> From: José H. Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> Hey Alexander, >> >> Version 2.44 of clips so maxima needs to be updated to reflect the >> changes. Attached is the latest maxima, and I submit it to the >> tracker along with the latest version of clips if you OK it. >> >> Also I change clips (>= 2.43-1) to *=* 2.44-1 I don't know if >> forcing the equal is a good idea, its your call. > > Couple questions: > > - Why is this clisp "Distribution: 10.4"? Good question. That may be a legacy issue--somebody other than the maintainer submitted an update so that clisp would be happy on 10.5, and it's possible that the description currently in Fink and this update need to be reconciled appropriately. > - Why is maxima the same %r-%v as the existing one? > That'd be an error. :-) I didn't look too closely at this. > If one fixes these in the obvious way, it builds OK on 10.5/intel. >
Great--thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
