Jeffery: please see the question at the bottom:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>
> Date: July 19, 2011 1:01:21 PM PDT
> To: "David R. Morrison" <d...@finkproject.org>
> Cc: Fink fink-devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, j...@lanl.gov
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] flag-sort
> Reply-To: Fink Developers Mailing List <Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/19/11 3:51 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> There was a recent revision to the transfig package which introduced
>> the use of fink's flag-sort package. However, it seems to have a
>> problem on 10.6: see below. Anybody have any advice about it?
>>
>> -- Dave
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> *From: *"Densmore, Jeffery D" <j...@lanl.gov <mailto:j...@lanl.gov>>
>>> *Date: *July 19, 2011 10:50:59 AM PDT *To: *"d...@finkproject.org
>>> <mailto:d...@finkproject.org>" <d...@finkproject.org
>>> <mailto:d...@finkproject.org>> *Subject: **Problem Building Newest
>>> Version of transfig-graphicx*
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> I'm getting the following error when building the newest version
>>> of transfig-graphicx:
>>>
>>> flag-sort -r -v cc -c -Os -Wall -Wpointer-arith -no-cpp-precomp
>>> -I.. -I/usr/X11/include -D__i386__ -D__DARWIN__
>>> -DNO_ALLOCA -DCSRG_BASED -DNFSS -DI18N -DUSE_PNG
>>> -DUSE_XPM -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/X11 fig2dev.c Can't
>>> exec "-r": No such file or directory at /sw/bin/flag-sort line 94.
>>> Could not exec -r: No such file or directory make[1]: ***
>>> [fig2dev.o] Error 2 making all in ./transfig... flag-sort -r -v cc
>>> -Os -Wall -Wpointer-arith -no-cpp-precomp -I.. -I/usr/X11/include
>>> -D__i386__ -D__DARWIN__ -DNO_ALLOCA -DCSRG_BASED -DLATEX2E
>>> -I/sw/include -c -o transfig.o transfig.c Can't exec "-r": No such
>>> file or directory at /sw/bin/flag-sort line 94. Could not exec -r:
>>> No such file or directory make[1]: *** [transfig.o] Error 2 make:
>>> *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.wM2Ph1 failed,
>>> exit code 2
>>>
>>> It looks like -r is a not a valid option for flag-sort, at least on
>>> my system:
>>>
>>> Package manager version: 0.30.2 Distribution version:
>>> selfupdate-rsync Tue Jul 19 11:39:58 2011, 10.6, i386 Trees:
>>> local/main stable/main stable/crypto Xcode Version: 3.2.6-1
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jeff
>>>
>>> Jeffery D. Densmore Computational Physics and Methods (CCS-2) Los
>>> Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663, MS D409 Los Alamos, NM
>>> 87545 phone: (505) 665-9198 fax: (505) 665-5538
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> It works here on 10.6.
>
> $ flag-sort -r
> Use of uninitialized value $ARGV[0] in pattern match (m//) at
> /sw64/bin/flag-sort line 36.
> Usage: /sw64/bin/flag-sort [-v] [-r] cmd [flags for cmd]
> resort [flags for cmd] and call cmd with them
> -r causes sort to put relative paths before absolute paths
> -v causes display of some diagnostics on STDOUT
>
> I used the -r flag to preserve the order of relative to absolute paths.
>
> What version of flag-sort do you have? (e.g. via "dpkg -l flag-sort")
> - --
> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
> Fink User Liaison
> http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk4l4pAACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8DQgCgigorvwhpRe46+tM2ku7mG7qS
> ZboAn2T1huxXOC/0rqassOYQFJGrg7Ts
> =L32Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
