On 4-3-2014 21:30, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: > People, what's the opinion on exceptions that use isc_ramdom to send > hardcoded messages? > Should we use isc_random for most of the future messages or should we > register more text in the messages db and lower the number of hardcoded > messages? > Being realistic, apparently nobody has bothered to create a source file with > error text translated to other language.
I prefer a specific error number, especially because sometimes people don't even bother to post error messages, but do include the error number. I don't think that not having translated error-messages is a good reason to stop using error numbers. Some errors can occur in multiple places, in that case having a single definition is better. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
