01.09.2014 19:58, Jim Starkey wrote: > Anybody see any problems with it?
I like neither DPB solution because it's DPB. It's not a "connection string" option, it's an API option. Surely not a problem for ISQL users that will support it out of the box. But most of existing user applications need to be recompiled to use the new option. Those devs who are too high level will have to wait until their underlying Firebird connectivity library is updated to support the new option. I don't call this user-friendly, sorry. IMHO, a DDL solution is much handier. And it's also implementable in a few hours. Relaxed write restriction for rdb$source is probably even easier to implement. And it doesn't require us to think about the forward compatible syntax. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
