On 11/6/2014 10:40 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > Hello, All. > > I wonder if SQL standard says something about syntax of transaction's > option for > disabling replication of changes made by this transaction? >
I might be wrong, but I think this whole topic needs a more than a bit more thought. Statement level multi-master replication is basically impossible to get right, so you need to pick among a set of bad options. There about a billion things that can go wrong (consider a timestamp or random number generator, for example) that requires hacks. The reason MySQL was able to charge $40k per node for an enterprise license was that an enterprise license was required to access support, and multi-master replication without expert support is so full of elephant pits that no rational person would want to go there without an emergency parachute. I strongly suggest that you not sweat the syntax until you get a firm grasp on the semantics. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
